WARDLEX Evidence, examined Book a demo
eDiscovery · Fraud examination · Digital forensics

The evidence never
leaves this machine.

WardLex ingests email, ledgers and Outlook archives, then hashes, searches, reviews and produces them — running entirely on your own computer. Nothing is uploaded. Every finding cites the passage it came from.

Watch it run — in your browser, right now

WARDLEX-0000001

An investigation you cannot contain
is not an investigation.

Most eDiscovery runs in someone else's data centre. That is a defensible choice for routine litigation and an indefensible one when the company is examining itself.

Privilege leaves the building

Uploading privileged material to a third-party platform means a vendor, its subprocessors and its jurisdiction now sit inside your matter. Certification is a promise about controls. It is not the same as the data never moving.

Internal matters cannot use external tools

When the subject of the investigation is an executive, a business unit, or the company itself, the collection cannot pass through systems the subject administers or a vendor the subject can call.

Volume outruns manual review

Reviewers read linearly; ledgers and mailboxes grow exponentially. Fraud language, duplicate payments and privilege all get missed under volume — and each miss is the kind that surfaces later, in the worst possible room.

WARDLEX-0000002

One workspace, the whole investigation.

Intake to production without the evidence ever reaching a network. Drop files anywhere and they are hashed, parsed, scanned and indexed before you see them.

Fraud examination, as a first-class discipline

Over 150 red-flag indicators across eight weighted categories, from concealment and falsification to consciousness of guilt. Every hit quotes the passage that triggered it, so a reviewer can dismiss it in context rather than trust a score.

  • Risk scoring
  • Benford's Law
  • Off-hours activity
  • Communication network

Forensic accounting on your ledgers

Point it at a payment file and it finds duplicate payments with a recoverable figure attached, amounts engineered just under approval limits, near-identical vendor names, and gaps in invoice sequences.

  • Duplicate exposure
  • Threshold clustering
  • Vendor anomalies

Chain of custody

SHA-256 on intake and a second digest over the extracted text, so tampering is detectable later. Digests verify against sha256sum outside the tool.

Review & production

Keyboard-fast coding for responsiveness and privilege, Bates numbering, privilege logs, redaction burned into every export, and DAT and OPT load files.

Counsel, on demand

Analysis is a button on the work, not a separate destination. Ask about any document or run a packaged workflow — triage, privilege pass, production readiness — and get a cited report. Offline.

WARDLEX-0000003

Where the difference actually is.

Not features — architecture. Capability parity arrives eventually for everyone; where the data physically sits does not.

Consideration Cloud platforms WardLex
Where evidence sits Vendor infrastructure Your machine, always
Trust model Certifications and contract The data does not move
Fraud examination Add-on, or absent Core discipline
Forensic hashing Varies by product Every file, independently verifiable
AI analysis Sends documents off-premises Runs offline, cites its sources
Time to first review Weeks of onboarding Open it and drop the files in
WardLex WARDLEX-0000004

Own the evidence.
Trust the findings.

See WardLex run against a corpus that looks like yours. Thirty minutes, your questions, no material leaves your side of the table.

  • We demo on our data, or on a sample you construct
  • No installation required to evaluate
  • Technical brief and security architecture available on request

Prefer email? support@wardlex.com

Request a demo Nothing you type here is evidence